🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation could be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the local level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

As this global conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments globally are no longer willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.